Review



control bms 3.0×12  (Abbott Laboratories)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Abbott Laboratories control bms 3.0×12
    Representative histology of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold <t>(</t> <t>ART</t> ‐ BRS ) (A) and bare metal stent ( <t>BMS</t> ) (C) with coregistered images of optical coherence tomography ( ART ‐ BRS , B; BMS , D) in a porcine coronary artery model from 1 to 36 months.
    Control Bms 3.0×12, supplied by Abbott Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+bms+3%2E0%C3%9712/bms+3+5%C3%9715/pmc05669179-35-9-13
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    control bms 3.0×12 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Comparison of a Drug‐Free Early Programmed Dismantling PDLLA Bioresorbable Scaffold and a Metallic Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model at 3‐Year Follow‐Up"

    Article Title: Comparison of a Drug‐Free Early Programmed Dismantling PDLLA Bioresorbable Scaffold and a Metallic Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model at 3‐Year Follow‐Up

    Journal: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

    doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005693

    Representative histology of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (C) with coregistered images of optical coherence tomography ( ART ‐ BRS , B; BMS , D) in a porcine coronary artery model from 1 to 36 months.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Representative histology of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (C) with coregistered images of optical coherence tomography ( ART ‐ BRS , B; BMS , D) in a porcine coronary artery model from 1 to 36 months.

    Techniques Used: Tomography

    Measurement of optical coherence tomography ( OCT ) (A) and strut classification (%) (B) of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) and bare metal stent ( BMS ). Line graphs show stent/scaffold area (a), lumen area (b), and area stenosis relative to the reference vessel segment (c) by optical coherence tomography analysis. The blue line represents BRS , and the red line represents BMS . Data are presented as mean±standard deviation. C, Representative images of strut classification by optical coherence tomography.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Measurement of optical coherence tomography ( OCT ) (A) and strut classification (%) (B) of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) and bare metal stent ( BMS ). Line graphs show stent/scaffold area (a), lumen area (b), and area stenosis relative to the reference vessel segment (c) by optical coherence tomography analysis. The blue line represents BRS , and the red line represents BMS . Data are presented as mean±standard deviation. C, Representative images of strut classification by optical coherence tomography.

    Techniques Used: Tomography, Standard Deviation

    Representative scanning electron microscopy images of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) at 1 and 3 months following implantation in porcine coronary arteries. The low‐power images show complete strut coverage at 1 month in both ART ‐ BRS (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (B), with similar findings at 3 months (C, ART ‐ BRS ; D, BMS ). High‐power images also show complete endothelialization by neointima with cells arranged in spindle and cobblestone morphology and showing well‐formed cell‐to‐cell contacts in both ART ‐ BRS and BMS .
    Figure Legend Snippet: Representative scanning electron microscopy images of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) at 1 and 3 months following implantation in porcine coronary arteries. The low‐power images show complete strut coverage at 1 month in both ART ‐ BRS (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (B), with similar findings at 3 months (C, ART ‐ BRS ; D, BMS ). High‐power images also show complete endothelialization by neointima with cells arranged in spindle and cobblestone morphology and showing well‐formed cell‐to‐cell contacts in both ART ‐ BRS and BMS .

    Techniques Used: Electron Microscopy

    Summary of Studied Animals and Implanted Materials for Light Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Gel Permeation Chromatography
    Figure Legend Snippet: Summary of Studied Animals and Implanted Materials for Light Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Gel Permeation Chromatography

    Techniques Used: Light Microscopy, Electron Microscopy

    Related Articles

    Control:

    Article Title: Comparison of a Drug‐Free Early Programmed Dismantling PDLLA Bioresorbable Scaffold and a Metallic Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model at 3‐Year Follow‐Up
    Article Snippet: The study protocol was reviewed, approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and performed at AccelLAB (Montreal, Canada); it was conducted in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care regulations. .. ART‐BRS (Arterial Remodeling Technologies, Paris, France) 3.0×11 mm and control BMS (Multilink Vision, Abbott, Santa Clara, CA) 3.0×12 mm were randomly implanted into the major coronary arteries and had a stent/scaffold‐to‐artery ratio of ≈1.1 to 1.2:1.0 in the coronary arteries of healthy Yucatan female or castrated male miniswine (30‐50 weeks, Lone Star Laboratory Swine, Sioux Center, IA) via femoral access following standard procedures as previously described. ..



    Similar Products

    control bms 3.0×12  (Abbott Laboratories)
    90
    Abbott Laboratories control bms 3.0×12
    Representative histology of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold <t>(</t> <t>ART</t> ‐ BRS ) (A) and bare metal stent ( <t>BMS</t> ) (C) with coregistered images of optical coherence tomography ( ART ‐ BRS , B; BMS , D) in a porcine coronary artery model from 1 to 36 months.
    Control Bms 3.0×12, supplied by Abbott Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/control+bms+3%2E0%C3%9712/bms+3+5%C3%9715/pmc05669179-35-9-13
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    control bms 3.0×12 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Representative histology of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (C) with coregistered images of optical coherence tomography ( ART ‐ BRS , B; BMS , D) in a porcine coronary artery model from 1 to 36 months.

    Journal: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

    Article Title: Comparison of a Drug‐Free Early Programmed Dismantling PDLLA Bioresorbable Scaffold and a Metallic Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model at 3‐Year Follow‐Up

    doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005693

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative histology of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (C) with coregistered images of optical coherence tomography ( ART ‐ BRS , B; BMS , D) in a porcine coronary artery model from 1 to 36 months.

    Article Snippet: ART‐BRS (Arterial Remodeling Technologies, Paris, France) 3.0×11 mm and control BMS (Multilink Vision, Abbott, Santa Clara, CA) 3.0×12 mm were randomly implanted into the major coronary arteries and had a stent/scaffold‐to‐artery ratio of ≈1.1 to 1.2:1.0 in the coronary arteries of healthy Yucatan female or castrated male miniswine (30‐50 weeks, Lone Star Laboratory Swine, Sioux Center, IA) via femoral access following standard procedures as previously described.

    Techniques: Tomography

    Measurement of optical coherence tomography ( OCT ) (A) and strut classification (%) (B) of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) and bare metal stent ( BMS ). Line graphs show stent/scaffold area (a), lumen area (b), and area stenosis relative to the reference vessel segment (c) by optical coherence tomography analysis. The blue line represents BRS , and the red line represents BMS . Data are presented as mean±standard deviation. C, Representative images of strut classification by optical coherence tomography.

    Journal: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

    Article Title: Comparison of a Drug‐Free Early Programmed Dismantling PDLLA Bioresorbable Scaffold and a Metallic Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model at 3‐Year Follow‐Up

    doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005693

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Measurement of optical coherence tomography ( OCT ) (A) and strut classification (%) (B) of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) and bare metal stent ( BMS ). Line graphs show stent/scaffold area (a), lumen area (b), and area stenosis relative to the reference vessel segment (c) by optical coherence tomography analysis. The blue line represents BRS , and the red line represents BMS . Data are presented as mean±standard deviation. C, Representative images of strut classification by optical coherence tomography.

    Article Snippet: ART‐BRS (Arterial Remodeling Technologies, Paris, France) 3.0×11 mm and control BMS (Multilink Vision, Abbott, Santa Clara, CA) 3.0×12 mm were randomly implanted into the major coronary arteries and had a stent/scaffold‐to‐artery ratio of ≈1.1 to 1.2:1.0 in the coronary arteries of healthy Yucatan female or castrated male miniswine (30‐50 weeks, Lone Star Laboratory Swine, Sioux Center, IA) via femoral access following standard procedures as previously described.

    Techniques: Tomography, Standard Deviation

    Representative scanning electron microscopy images of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) at 1 and 3 months following implantation in porcine coronary arteries. The low‐power images show complete strut coverage at 1 month in both ART ‐ BRS (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (B), with similar findings at 3 months (C, ART ‐ BRS ; D, BMS ). High‐power images also show complete endothelialization by neointima with cells arranged in spindle and cobblestone morphology and showing well‐formed cell‐to‐cell contacts in both ART ‐ BRS and BMS .

    Journal: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

    Article Title: Comparison of a Drug‐Free Early Programmed Dismantling PDLLA Bioresorbable Scaffold and a Metallic Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model at 3‐Year Follow‐Up

    doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005693

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative scanning electron microscopy images of Arterial Remodeling Technologies bioresorbable scaffold ( ART ‐ BRS ) at 1 and 3 months following implantation in porcine coronary arteries. The low‐power images show complete strut coverage at 1 month in both ART ‐ BRS (A) and bare metal stent ( BMS ) (B), with similar findings at 3 months (C, ART ‐ BRS ; D, BMS ). High‐power images also show complete endothelialization by neointima with cells arranged in spindle and cobblestone morphology and showing well‐formed cell‐to‐cell contacts in both ART ‐ BRS and BMS .

    Article Snippet: ART‐BRS (Arterial Remodeling Technologies, Paris, France) 3.0×11 mm and control BMS (Multilink Vision, Abbott, Santa Clara, CA) 3.0×12 mm were randomly implanted into the major coronary arteries and had a stent/scaffold‐to‐artery ratio of ≈1.1 to 1.2:1.0 in the coronary arteries of healthy Yucatan female or castrated male miniswine (30‐50 weeks, Lone Star Laboratory Swine, Sioux Center, IA) via femoral access following standard procedures as previously described.

    Techniques: Electron Microscopy

    Summary of Studied Animals and Implanted Materials for Light Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Gel Permeation Chromatography

    Journal: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

    Article Title: Comparison of a Drug‐Free Early Programmed Dismantling PDLLA Bioresorbable Scaffold and a Metallic Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model at 3‐Year Follow‐Up

    doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005693

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of Studied Animals and Implanted Materials for Light Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Gel Permeation Chromatography

    Article Snippet: ART‐BRS (Arterial Remodeling Technologies, Paris, France) 3.0×11 mm and control BMS (Multilink Vision, Abbott, Santa Clara, CA) 3.0×12 mm were randomly implanted into the major coronary arteries and had a stent/scaffold‐to‐artery ratio of ≈1.1 to 1.2:1.0 in the coronary arteries of healthy Yucatan female or castrated male miniswine (30‐50 weeks, Lone Star Laboratory Swine, Sioux Center, IA) via femoral access following standard procedures as previously described.

    Techniques: Light Microscopy, Electron Microscopy